We took a deep dive into new maps submissions to see how many more closely contested elections there would project to be under new maps. Spoiler: It's a lot.
What I said about your January 5th article, I will say about this one as well: "A concise and eloquent summation of this struggle. Thank you for your informed voice."
After contiguous, I think compactness should be the second most important criteria. Dr. Petering's FastMap alternative is the most compact. So sad that the FastMap alternative won't be considered. Why didn't one of the other Dem groups adopt the FastMap alternative?
What I said about your January 5th article, I will say about this one as well: "A concise and eloquent summation of this struggle. Thank you for your informed voice."
Excellent job, Dan!
Thank you Dan for your detailed well written analysis of this issue.
As usual, a thoughtful, clear and compelling description and analysis from Dan Shafer of an important issue for residents of Wisconsin.
Where can I find the map that was passed this week?
After contiguous, I think compactness should be the second most important criteria. Dr. Petering's FastMap alternative is the most compact. So sad that the FastMap alternative won't be considered. Why didn't one of the other Dem groups adopt the FastMap alternative?